One definition of "faith" is based on confidence or trust. It is not mere "blind faith" that is based on lack of belief, because of lack of proof and knowledge. Perhaps, sound is only heard because most individuals have "faith" in this sense, which becomes part of our working knowledge that exists as part of current paradigm (as Sheldrake defines paradigm, according to Kuhn's definition*). Maybe, our senses are developed to the capacity of our faith. Maybe our collective belief and memory contributes to our collective acceptance of our five senses. Maybe intuition as a sixth sense is actually tied to faith and its morphic field. Some societies readily accept the concept of "soul" and "faith." Some societies accept the view that women are more spiritually in tune and more easily access "intuition." Some Native American tribes accept the existence of "double souls," or those who possess androgynous spirits. Usually, this means a male living as a woman, or a female living as a man, on the material plane.
Essentially, I'm down with a paradigm shift.
*According to Sheldrake's interpretation of Kuhn, a paradigm is "at any given time...a consensus within each group about the way reality operates and the way that problems should be solved...it is a shared consensual view of reality upon which the professional group depends. In each group, the members recognize those they consider proper members...and those whom they recognize as outsiders, as not being within their group [social aspect]...[it] also includes a model of the way problems can and should be solved." There are examples of how problems should be solved and what are acceptable solutions. "A shift in paradigm involves both a new way of solving problems (because there is a new way of thinking about the problems involved), and also the building up of a new social consensus among practitioners. [...] A view of paradigms as morphic fields help us to understand why they are so strongly conservative in nature, for once the paradigms are established, there is a large social group contributing to the consensual reality of the paradigm. A very powerful morphic resonance is evolved by this way of doing things; and that is why paradigm changes tend to be rather rare, and why they meet with strong resistance."
Essentially, I'm down with a paradigm shift.
*According to Sheldrake's interpretation of Kuhn, a paradigm is "at any given time...a consensus within each group about the way reality operates and the way that problems should be solved...it is a shared consensual view of reality upon which the professional group depends. In each group, the members recognize those they consider proper members...and those whom they recognize as outsiders, as not being within their group [social aspect]...[it] also includes a model of the way problems can and should be solved." There are examples of how problems should be solved and what are acceptable solutions. "A shift in paradigm involves both a new way of solving problems (because there is a new way of thinking about the problems involved), and also the building up of a new social consensus among practitioners. [...] A view of paradigms as morphic fields help us to understand why they are so strongly conservative in nature, for once the paradigms are established, there is a large social group contributing to the consensual reality of the paradigm. A very powerful morphic resonance is evolved by this way of doing things; and that is why paradigm changes tend to be rather rare, and why they meet with strong resistance."
